2 ms·
You ignored the parent comment's next sentence: > Now, there is a business in pissing video games like content, but there is only spots for a few big conglomer
by personjerry 7y ago
You ignored the parent comment's next sentence:
> Now, there is a business in pissing video games like content, but there is only spots for a few big conglomerates that will profits from the quantity, not the quality.
- Ygg2 7y agoSure. And if you exclude all browser vendors that have control over some ecosystem, Firefox is #1 browser. Why is eliminating largest games by revenue in his case justifiable?
- Dobbs 7y agoBecause the models these games use is not sustainable for all games. Sports games have several things going for them that normal games don't. Like being simulations of the real world, so as players move, etc then the game gets updated. Secondly there is an inherint monopoly on sports games. There is only one official NFL game.
- Ygg2 7y agoAnd two popular soccer games, so there is a slight chance of a duopoly. Still. What about Call of Duty? What about Sequels?
- SXX 7y agoI just tend to disagree with this sentence too. Basically there a lot of game developers even in hardcore genres who efficiently maintain content-driven games: almost all simulators, economic strategies, Paradox-interactive strategies. There is number of small companies with only 20-30 employees who maintain their projects over decades basically releasing more of the same every couple of years.