3 ms·
In a few words you said that the $40.000 pro monitor that Apple used as reference in their comparison is a marketing gimmick for consumers I think the comment
by laughinghan 7y ago
In a few words you said that the $40.000 pro monitor that Apple used as reference in their comparison is a marketing gimmick for consumers
I think the comment you're replying to called Sony's "infinite contrast" OLEDs a "marketing gimmick for consumers". This Sony BRAVIA OLED is listed for <$2,000: https://www.newegg.com/p/16C-0006-00183?Description=sony%20oled&cm_re=sony_oled-_-16C-0006-00183-_-Product https://www.newegg.com/p/16C-0006-00183?Description=sony%20o...
That seems like a consumer price point to me.
- thefounder 7y agoMaybe you should look at the Pro displays instead of some consumer TVs? Btw Apple said other lies there too(i.e that Sony sells only small<17"> pro displays). You may also wonder why Apple put an OLED display on its flagship phone instead of a LED one. Prediction: next Apple display will be OLED and they will make it sound like they invented it or are first to use this tech...just like they did with Apple TV 4K(even if 4K was already old/common tech at that time) https://www.marcotec-shop.com/en/sony-bvm-x300-oled-monitor-7783.html https://www.marcotec-shop.com/en/sony-bvm-x300-oled-monitor-... https://pro.sony/en_FI/products/broadcast-monitors/pro-monitors-explained#MEAE101720ChooseYourMonitor-pro-monitors-explained https://pro.sony/en_FI/products/broadcast-monitors/pro-monit...
- laughinghan 7y agoI'm not sure why I would look at the Pro displays. I don't know anything about displays, I only know that you misread or mischaracterized the comment you were replying to. You said the comment you were replying to said that a pro monitor was a marketing gimmick for consumers. But that's not what the comment said.