4 ms·
According to the post, that's not what happened? The customer account wasn't terminated by the automated system, but rather by the second Abuse Ops agent. Upon
by laughinghan 7y ago
According to the post, that's not what happened? The customer account wasn't terminated by the automated system, but rather by the second Abuse Ops agent.
Upon a second review by a different Abuse Operations agent [...] the agent fully denied access back into the account. This action triggered the final “access denied” communication to the customer.
- mintplant 7y agoThat was after the automated process locked access to the account and powered off all associated machines.
- computerex 7y agoRead the post? > The initial account lock and resource power down resulted from an automated service that monitors for cryptocurrency mining activity (Droplet CPU loads and Droplet create behaviors).