3 ms·
> Further evidence: Windows 7 wasn't even that much of a change from Vista. I seem to recall Vista was way more sluggish than 7 on the same machines.
by mehrdadn 7y ago
> Further evidence: Windows 7 wasn't even that much of a change from Vista.
I seem to recall Vista was way more sluggish than 7 on the same machines.
- soulofmischief 7y agoW7 actually has lower minimum requirements than Vista. I've gotten 7 running on plenty of devices that Vista wouldn't touch.
- paxys 7y agoMost of the anecdotal evidence was comparing a laptop running with years' worth of bloated software to a fresh install. No surprise that Windows 7 came out ahead.
- mehrdadn 7y agoI was referring to my own experience of fresh installs of both.
- adiabatty 7y agoI second this. I had a secondary computer that I switched between Vista and 7, back and forth, for various reasons, and it was much, _much_ slower on Vista than 7.