3 ms·
Could it be that, because you're living there, you're used to the sight? And, conversely, people traveling halfway across Europe to visit Greece are just bored
by antisemiotic 7y ago
Could it be that, because you're living there, you're used to the sight? And, conversely, people traveling halfway across Europe to visit Greece are just bored of their own neighbourhood? (sure, most likely many people are missing places they could go that are much closer but less advertised).
>Local cultures are diluted everywhere, and when they are preserved in touristy places it's artificial.
There are plenty of things to do when traveling that don't involve bothering local people. I don't see how just looking at the nature, for example, is any less "meaningful".
>Tourism nowadays is largely escapism
Protip: all entertainment is escapism.
- buboard 7y ago- There is definitely something about changing environment/traveling that is rewarding. (When mice are put into a unfamiliar environment, their hippocampus is more active and they become more active). But perhaps this need can be satisfied with much shorter distances rather than mass intercontinental flights. - There is definitely some value to traveling, but it is greatly inflated by social pressure, the media, and the fact that most tourist destinations are cheap to westerners. - Yeah, but some escapism is more eco-friendly than others
- bubblewrap 7y ago"all entertainment is escapism" Yes - but not all entertainment produces the same amount of carbon dioxide. That's the point. If you say you need to travel to Greece for entertainment, it seems even less justifiable. At most you could say it is educational and opens your mind about different cultures and so on. But even for that, I'd say the costs are not warranted, and there are many other ways to learn.