3 ms·

They confused two companies in Toronto that are both caused C7. It's an easy mistake to make, and one that was corrected in just a few days. You just posted a

They confused two companies in Toronto that are both caused C7. It's an easy mistake to make, and one that was corrected in just a few days. You just posted a link to a blog that rates NordVPN as it's #2 rated VPN, and hasn't even reviewed TorGuard yet, so that source is not credible at all.

preommr 7y ago
> hasn't even reviewed TorGuard yet, so that source is not credible at all We're not comparing service quality so I don't understand what them not having reviewed TorGuard has to do with anything. FWIW, I think the link posted was clearer and fairly objective. I 'll also add that the other video you made: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwHssMNEWMg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwHssMNEWMg is more useful because it addresses some questions I had like why NordVPN would think to remove your video through TorGuard and if they had reached out to you directly. All in all, very strange situation and I am interested to see how this pans out.
- Tomspark 7y ago
  It's relevant because RestorePrivacy has a clear bias against TorGuard since it's based within the US. Sven Taylor hasn't reviewed TG yet on purpose, and the fact he mentions 4 year old "VPN.AC" stuff agaisnt TorGuard in the article, just goes to show the article isn't just a news piece but it's obvious he's taking sides. He fails to mention several important bits of information on Nord's response I covered in my video.. News has to be objective. He doesn't mention how A) NordVPN was given a file instead of the file being given to TorGuard first which is extremely weird, B) NordVPN does not mention showing up to TG's house C) Why would NordVPN help TG fix a bug when the two companies have been butting heads for years now? D) NordVPN admits in the blog post that they started the conversation in hope TG would stop "defaming them" which is basically an insinuation of blackmail. E) NordVPN has not denied any actual relationship to Collective Seven yet. I could continue down the alphabet, but you get the picture (watch my video on it).

preommr 7y ago

> hasn't even reviewed TorGuard yet, so that source is not credible at all We're not comparing service quality so I don't understand what them not having reviewed TorGuard has to do with anything. FWIW, I think the link posted was clearer and fairly objective. I 'll also add that the other video you made: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwHssMNEWMg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwHssMNEWMg is more useful because it addresses some questions I had like why NordVPN would think to remove your video through TorGuard and if they had reached out to you directly. All in all, very strange situation and I am interested to see how this pans out.

Tomspark 7y ago
It's relevant because RestorePrivacy has a clear bias against TorGuard since it's based within the US. Sven Taylor hasn't reviewed TG yet on purpose, and the fact he mentions 4 year old "VPN.AC" stuff agaisnt TorGuard in the article, just goes to show the article isn't just a news piece but it's obvious he's taking sides. He fails to mention several important bits of information on Nord's response I covered in my video.. News has to be objective. He doesn't mention how A) NordVPN was given a file instead of the file being given to TorGuard first which is extremely weird, B) NordVPN does not mention showing up to TG's house C) Why would NordVPN help TG fix a bug when the two companies have been butting heads for years now? D) NordVPN admits in the blog post that they started the conversation in hope TG would stop "defaming them" which is basically an insinuation of blackmail. E) NordVPN has not denied any actual relationship to Collective Seven yet. I could continue down the alphabet, but you get the picture (watch my video on it).