4 ms·
> reflects the indisputable reality of the proposal No, it reflects your stubborn partisan viewpoint which I'm uninterested in debating. https://www.people-pr
by root_axis 7y ago
> reflects the indisputable reality of the proposal
No, it reflects your stubborn partisan viewpoint which I'm uninterested in debating.
https://www.people-press.org/2015/08/13/continued-bipartisan-support-for-expanded-background-checks-on-gun-sales/8-12-2015-3-56-39-pm/ https://www.people-press.org/2015/08/13/continued-bipartisan...
The numbers speak for themselves. Unless you have some alternative polling data to show I am not interested.
- SlowRobotAhead 7y ago>The numbers speak for themselves Except that’s exactly my point that you can’t argue. How about in Washington. I-594 required background checks. The NRA spent a lot of money fighting it - but was outspent by gun control groups over 14:1, 10:1 of that was Michael Bloomberg alone. You know results when it was actually put to a vote? 60/40. A far cry from the polling lie that 92% want mandatory background checks on all sales performed by a dealer for a fee who has no obligation to perform using a system that has no obligation to be online.