Color me skeptical that an idea that has existed for over half a century still isn't feasible. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/65124/how-is-a-flyi

Color me skeptical that an idea that has existed for over half a century still isn't feasible. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/65124/how-is-a-flying-v-more-efficient-than-current-fuselage-over-wing-designs https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/65124/how-is-a-... https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/12782/why-are-there-no-blended-wing-passenger-airplanes-in-operation https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/12782/why-are-t... A little more skepticism: > Sadly for the Flying-V, it will probably fail like the blended wing body designs we've seen down the years. It's for the same reason, too: airplanes bank as they turn. That's not much of a problem in a conventional airliner design, where passengers are never that far from the plane's central axis. But as you move further out from that central axis the effect becomes a lot more pronounced. https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/06/radical-new-airliner-could-save-fuel-but-ride-like-a-roller-coaster/ https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/06/radical-new-airliner-co... There really is nothing new about a lifting-body design.