4 ms·
In my experience, unless you extensively customize bash, you won’t notice the change except to be pleasantly surprised by a few bits nicer UI. At the poweruser
by burke 7y ago
In my experience, unless you extensively customize bash, you won’t notice the change except to be pleasantly surprised by a few bits nicer UI. At the poweruser end, zsh is more configurable and dramatically nicer to configure (and documented a bit better).
For the most part, bash scripts work without modification in zsh.
- muro 7y agoSome Linux distributions already use "dash" instead of "bash", though dash is much more compatible. Edit: debian does it. More info: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dash https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dash
- NathanOsullivan 7y agoIt's worth pointing out they use dash for scripts that do not explicitly require bash . The default interactive shell is still bash