4 ms·
Exactly!! I run exclusively 2k and it's not the end of the world imo. I'm running a 1:1 right now and holy cow. I know it's probably bias but I will say it's a
by folkhack 7y ago
Exactly!! I run exclusively 2k and it's not the end of the world imo.
I'm running a 1:1 right now and holy cow. I know it's probably bias but I will say it's actually the best monitor I've ever used... I'm a developer so the balance between LOC on screen at full width is AMAZING. Color isn't fantastic on it but honestly I have two monitors flanking it on the left/right that are calibrated enough for basic print/photo needs.
The thing is - I'm still using it for things like PS and Illustrator because 1:1 works so well for complex applications like that... I just check color on a better monitor.
- nextos 7y agoGlad to hear you like it! Perhaps for programming, if one can only afford a single monitor, 2K 16:10 (2560x1600) would be better than the 1:1 1920x1920 Eizo offers. That gives you the ability to split screen into two windows that have an aspect ratio very close to A4, sqrt(2). With Eizo, the split is a bit too narrow or too short. However, for a single application the 1:1 is amazing. And sadly all 2K 16:10 are old models on their way out...