2 ms·
My assumption is that the OP meant - every company is compared to Apple and Google and Facebook in terms of profit. That the business in question has to make ex
by Loughla 7y ago
My assumption is that the OP meant - every company is compared to Apple and Google and Facebook in terms of profit. That the business in question has to make extreme amounts of money to be considered a success, when in reality, if the business is sustainable and marginally profitable, it should be good enough for some cases.
- at-fates-hands 7y agoIf we're talking about privacy, there seems to be a direct correlation between the size of a companies profits and their willingness to sell your private information. As someone who values my privacy, I prefer smaller, stable companies because I'm more confident they are acting with my best interests in mind; not chasing massive growth and huge profits. I spend quite a bit of money per month to maintain some semblance of privacy and none of the companies I support are raking in millions in profit every quarter.
- scarface74 7y agoUntil they get bought out by a larger company. See Onova....
- at-fates-hands 7y agoAgreed. At which point I'm free to move to a different provider, but yes, this is always a possibility.