That doesn't make sense on several levels including mathematically. Two sterile immortals would use less resources than a stable progression of two child averag

That doesn't make sense on several levels including mathematically. Two sterile immortals would use less resources than a stable progression of two child average couples in a generation. There would exist therefore a middling equivalent or lesser resource using immortal reproduction k per t or n additional projection than say N per generation mortals. Not to mention the theft framework is nonsensical - while it is a good thing to have sustainable systems and resources how can one steal from that which does not exist and may not ever even? Under that framework I could accuse anyone of wrongfully occupying the space of an entity which may only exist at the end of time after all intelligent life is dead - which is more absurd than the invisible pink unicorn arguements.