3 ms·
They aren't stitched together, they're tiled. When you're loading Google Maps, you're loading dozens of relatively small resolution images.
by kristofferR 16y ago
They aren't stitched together, they're tiled. When you're loading Google Maps, you're loading dozens of relatively small resolution images.
- InclinedPlane 16y agoAnd? I don't need to hook up fiddler to know that when I hit sevilla111.com I'm not pulling down a 0.1 terapixel image all in one go, I'm only ever loading a teeny tiny (tiled) sub-section of the raw image or a lower res version of the whole. Which isn't much different than google maps/Earth.
- kristofferR 16y agoThere's a difference. For this 111GP image there was taken 9750 images. Those images were then merged together to a single image using Autopano Giga and then split for the ease of presentation. Google's satelite photography on the other hand has never been merged into one huge image.
- ghshephard 16y agoI'm with the OP. These images have not been merged together to form a single image. There is no 111 Gigapixel image out there that represents this picture. As you zoom in, you hit a different tile-layer.
- singlow 16y agoMaybe the fact that this "single photo" is taken from a single vantage point makes it a record?
- kristofferR 16y agoWell, turns out I wasn't entirely correct for this picture. They rendered it to three bigass images: http://translate.google.es/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sevilla111.com%2Fcomosehizo.htm&sl=es&tl=en&hl=&ie=UTF-8 http://translate.google.es/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sevi... For some of the other massive Gigapixel photographs I've seen they've rendered it down to only one image file: http://70gigapixel.cloudapp.net/index_en.html#3 http://70gigapixel.cloudapp.net/index_en.html#3
- jerf 16y ago"Google's satelite photography on the other hand has never been merged into one huge image." [citation needed] How do you know that? What are the odds someone in their organization has done that for kicks at some point? Or anybody else with a similar dataset.
- kristofferR 16y agoTrue, but records aren't considered records if they're kept secret. Even if I could hold my breath for 25 minutes, Stig Severinsen would be considered as the best in the world at holding his breath until I publicly demonstrated that I could beat his time.