7 ms·
> Someone said "I want to know end to end latency", to which I comment that it isn't important to know this to consider this a positive improvement, given that
by Eldt 7y ago
> Someone said "I want to know end to end latency", to which I comment that it isn't important to know this to consider this a positive improvement, given that there's a measurable marked reduction in latency.
It might not be necessary information to know to understand that an improvement was made, but knowing the end to end latency would be interesting to see. The gp expressed an interest in the end to end latency and you responded with a dismissive comment which didn't answer their question.
- coldtea 7y ago>The gp expressed an interest in the end to end latency and you responded with a dismissive comment which didn't answer their question. It wasn't meant to answer their question, it was meant to point on the relevance (or lack thereof) of the answer to the question to appreciate the improvement. In other words, the gp seemed to dismiss the improvement, because what would be important for them would be to know the "end to end" latency.