4 ms·
Agreed. If your results are not reproducible by others, the publication should issue a retraction and withdraw your work. Code that works is essential.
by randcraw 7y ago
Agreed. If your results are not reproducible by others, the publication should issue a retraction and withdraw your work. Code that works is essential.
- Volt 7y agoI hope you're a scientist.
- dodobirdlord 7y agoNonsense! The "reproducible" in "reproducible result" doesn't mean anything except that what is described in the paper can be reproduced. Code that works is nice and all, but totally irrelevant to the question of reproducibility. Would you claim that that the Higgs paper must be retracted because CERN won't ship you the LHC? They've got ATLAS and CMS to demonstrate reproducibility, and they're wildly different!