4 ms·

That is because the DOJ website is only interested in defining lawful vs unlawful monopoly, not defining what a monopoly is. The definition of the word "Monopo

That is because the DOJ website is only interested in defining lawful vs unlawful monopoly, not defining what a monopoly is. The definition of the word "Monopoly" is already widely denoted as supply side control: - Wikipedia: The exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly) - Investopedia: A monopoly exists when a single entity is the sole provider of a particular asset or service. (https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/032415/whats-difference-between-monopoly-and-monopsony.asp https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/032415/whats-differ...) - Oxford Dictionary: The exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service. (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/monopoly https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/monopoly)

stcredzero 7y ago
The definition of the word "Monopoly" is already widely denoted as supply side control: That's obviously too narrow. Someone controlling the demand side could be just as obnoxious. A company in a company town is in control of the demand side of the labor market, for example.
- bduerst 7y ago
  So you think Oxford Dictionary, Wikipedia, and Investopedia are all too narrow with words? Control of the demand side of a market is called a Monopsony, not Monopoly. It's mentioned in the thread above, more info here: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopsony.asp https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopsony.asp
  - stcredzero 7y ago
    You are correct, sir! I remember now HN has had this discussion before. However, I think most people would refer to both a Monopsony and Monopoly as the latter.
    - kortilla 7y ago
      No, that’s not true. People rarely even consider that there is a special term for being the only buyer or controlling all of the buyers. I can’t think of any scenarios where people referred to the military as having a monopoly on the missile market. It doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t even make missiles.
      - stcredzero 7y ago
        I can’t think of any scenarios where people referred to the military as having a monopoly on the missile market. But Farmers being ravaged by middlemen would use that term about the middlemen buying their crops.

stcredzero 7y ago

The definition of the word "Monopoly" is already widely denoted as supply side control: That's obviously too narrow. Someone controlling the demand side could be just as obnoxious. A company in a company town is in control of the demand side of the labor market, for example.

bduerst 7y ago
So you think Oxford Dictionary, Wikipedia, and Investopedia are all too narrow with words? Control of the demand side of a market is called a Monopsony, not Monopoly. It's mentioned in the thread above, more info here: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopsony.asp https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopsony.asp
- stcredzero 7y ago
  You are correct, sir! I remember now HN has had this discussion before. However, I think most people would refer to both a Monopsony and Monopoly as the latter.
  - kortilla 7y ago
    No, that’s not true. People rarely even consider that there is a special term for being the only buyer or controlling all of the buyers. I can’t think of any scenarios where people referred to the military as having a monopoly on the missile market. It doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t even make missiles.
    - stcredzero 7y ago
      I can’t think of any scenarios where people referred to the military as having a monopoly on the missile market. But Farmers being ravaged by middlemen would use that term about the middlemen buying their crops.