3 ms·
Completely agree. The situation today is far better than a decade ago, with code releases for machine learning and computer vision papers being much more common
by chriskanan 7y ago
Completely agree. The situation today is far better than a decade ago, with code releases for machine learning and computer vision papers being much more common than before.
I try to make my students release polished and easy to use code, but it can sometimes fall through the cracks due to deadlines, etc. Many projects are the output of a single PhD student.
- newen 7y agoYep, it's so much better now in computer vision with early publishing in arxiv and published code. I feel like that is one of the reasons why research in CV is progressing so fast. Also, I think it is something of a fact of life that you can't put all of the details of your algorithm in the paper, not just paper length limitations. I have actually tried to do this in two papers by putting all of the details in the supplements and the work to explain all the details and justify my choice of parameters and decisions for edge cases is almost as hard as writing the main paper. It becomes hard to justify the time spent pretty fast. Also, putting this in the main paper makes your beautiful explanations be tinged with edge cases and digressions haha.