3 ms·
My point is that a developer is spending (give or take) $4K extra for utility they don't need (my argument being that $2K should get a dev all the monitor they'
by mikestew 7y ago
My point is that a developer is spending (give or take) $4K extra for utility they don't need (my argument being that $2K should get a dev all the monitor they'll ever need). A well-paid developer can afford to do that once in a while, but they have to be choosy, maybe spend that $4k of extra utility you don't need toward upgrading the BMW to the "M" version you'll never put to full use on public streets. Buy that Colnago bicycle you'll never be in good enough shape to put to full potential.
But blow $6K on a monitor when $2K will do? Nah, you need a multi-million dollar exit for that kind of diamond-crusted iPhone silliness. The rest of us wage-slave devs making only $250K/year make do with 5K monitors that are more than good enough.
- coldtea 7y ago>But blow $6K on a monitor when $2K will do? Nah, you need a multi-million dollar exit for that kind of diamond-crusted iPhone silliness. Err, I know a few people making $200K and up, routinely spending similar money for BS like Leica cameras + lenses (and they're not pro photographers), or hi-fi amplifiers. Not to mention furniture and fine art. There are mid-of-the-market headphones people buy that are $500k -- and those are not even considered expensive. 6K for a great monitor, which could even be the last one you'll ever need to buy is a bargain compared.