5 ms·
What's "protected" about a bike lane that crosses freeway onramps? I think you're talking about something completely different from what some other people in th
by greglindahl 7y ago
What's "protected" about a bike lane that crosses freeway onramps? I think you're talking about something completely different from what some other people in this discussion are calling "protected" lanes.
Around here, the "protected" way to cross a freeway is a bicycle/pedestrian bridge. These usually have entrances and exits on residential streets.
- btrettel 7y ago> What's "protected" about a bike lane that crosses freeway onramps? I think you're talking about something completely different from what some other people in this discussion are calling "protected" lanes. "Protected" here refers to the bike lane itself having a physical barrier in the straight sections. The barrier disappears at intersections and crossings. I know from discussions with others (particularly Europeans) that this doesn't meet a stronger definition, but this is what "protected bike lane" means in my experience as a US cyclist. I agree entirely that the "protection" this style of lane affords is not enough. > Around here, the "protected" way to cross a freeway is a bicycle/pedestrian bridge. These usually have entrances and exits on residential streets. That's one good way to do it, but I strongly doubt the city of Austin will implement anything like that at the intersection I have in mind.