>> Was that censorship in order to conform to US law? >Yes. Abridgement of speech in any form is censorship. That wasn't the question asked. "Please respond

>> Was that censorship in order to conform to US law? >Yes. Abridgement of speech in any form is censorship. That wasn't the question asked. "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize." The question was whether the other examples were compelled by government law. That puts them in a different category. Unless you would like to argue that the other censorship was performed to keep the organizers out of prison, your argument falls flat.