3 ms·

I agree. The biggest cause of issues between cars and bikes has got to be speed differential, so if I'm on the appropriate bike i always ride in traffic. The bi

I agree. The biggest cause of issues between cars and bikes has got to be speed differential, so if I'm on the appropriate bike i always ride in traffic. The bike lanes always get the worst sections of road (the curb) with cracks, drains and debris, Plus cars right hooking you, a car door biting you or a jaywalker on their cellphone are not infrequent risks. That said there is a big biking population who should not be riding in traffic so without separated bike lanes can't get to parts of my city

SketchySeaBeast 7y ago
> biggest cause of issues between cars and bikes has got to be speed differential, so if I'm on the appropriate bike i always ride in traffic >That said there is a big biking population who should not be riding in traffic so without separated bike lanes can't get to parts of my city I was going to say - I've yet to see a biker keep up with commuter traffic, which would make the speed differential a problem.
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]
- tomjakubowski 7y ago
  At rush hour it can be easy to beat commuters in cars on your bike.
  - SketchySeaBeast 7y ago
    But that's due to the average velocity being low, not the maximum velocity. Also, bikes have the advantage of weaving past traffic in those circumstances.
    - kiliantics 7y ago
      In most cities, average velocity is always low. Where I live, I can beat driving time on my bike for any distance that takes less than an hour. (I can always beat public transit over these distances and further too.) It's basically pointless to drive if you could bike instead and yet so many do it anyway.
chapium 7y ago
Speed is usually not an issue on city roads. Turns and blind spots are bad. Some people try to pass just so they can get to the next red light quicker. Usually if its congested enough that its not safe for a car to pass a cyclist the cyclist is usually able to go faster than traffic. Cars lose a lot of time decelerating and accelerating for frequent stops. Its even an annoyance to the biker because on car is hit about wanting to pass and then the biker keeps waiting at intersections for cars to get up to speed.

SketchySeaBeast 7y ago

> biggest cause of issues between cars and bikes has got to be speed differential, so if I'm on the appropriate bike i always ride in traffic >That said there is a big biking population who should not be riding in traffic so without separated bike lanes can't get to parts of my city I was going to say - I've yet to see a biker keep up with commuter traffic, which would make the speed differential a problem.

deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
tomjakubowski 7y ago
At rush hour it can be easy to beat commuters in cars on your bike.
- SketchySeaBeast 7y ago
  But that's due to the average velocity being low, not the maximum velocity. Also, bikes have the advantage of weaving past traffic in those circumstances.
  - kiliantics 7y ago
    In most cities, average velocity is always low. Where I live, I can beat driving time on my bike for any distance that takes less than an hour. (I can always beat public transit over these distances and further too.) It's basically pointless to drive if you could bike instead and yet so many do it anyway.

chapium 7y ago

Speed is usually not an issue on city roads. Turns and blind spots are bad. Some people try to pass just so they can get to the next red light quicker. Usually if its congested enough that its not safe for a car to pass a cyclist the cyclist is usually able to go faster than traffic. Cars lose a lot of time decelerating and accelerating for frequent stops. Its even an annoyance to the biker because on car is hit about wanting to pass and then the biker keeps waiting at intersections for cars to get up to speed.