3 ms·

> For the downvoters, please just link here the proof if you disagree. > Here are the S3 numbers: https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/ https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/

by qes 7y ago

> For the downvoters, please just link here the proof if you disagree. > Here are the S3 numbers: https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/ https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/ 99.9% https://azure.microsoft.com/en-au/support/legal/sla/storage/v1_4/ https://azure.microsoft.com/en-au/support/legal/sla/storage/... 99.99%

StreamBright 7y ago
Azure is a cloud solution. The thread is about how a random datacenter with a random solution is better than S3.
- ozymandias12 7y ago
  Wow, he’s comparing the storages SLA of the two biggest cloud services in the world. Pedantic behavior should hurt.
ti_ranger 7y ago
>> Here are the S3 numbers: https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/ https://aws.amazon.com/s3/sla/ > 99.9% (single-region) There doesn't seem to be an SLA on S3-cross-region-replication configurations, but I am not aware of a multi-region S3 (read) outage, ever. > https://azure.microsoft.com/en-au/support/legal/sla/storage/.. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-au/support/legal/sla/storage/.... > 99.99% 99.99% is for "Read Access-Geo Redundant Storage (RA-GRS)" Their equivalent SLA is the same (99.9% for "Locally Redundant Storage (LRS), Zone Redundant Storage (ZRS), and Geo Redundant Storage (GRS) Accounts.").