>FISA warrants aren't remotely relevant to the policy at hand of wanting routine social media identifiers. Uh, how so? It provides a known good selector for fu

>FISA warrants aren't remotely relevant to the policy at hand of wanting routine social media identifiers. Uh, how so? It provides a known good selector for future surveillance. It’s probably the reason it’s on the form and the privacy implications are definitely relevant to the discussion. >You literally think those three (I think it's three) judges are going to pen hundreds of millions of signatures on physical pieces of paper? They do bulk orders. https://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/verizon-telephone-data-court-order https://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/jun/06/ve...