You raise an interesting point, but I don't think making any sort of generalization is the answer here. There are good and bad people of every gender/race. Henc

You raise an interesting point, but I don't think making any sort of generalization is the answer here. There are good and bad people of every gender/race. Hence why every incident needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. With regard to the original article, it appears to be a singularly bad ruling on MSU's part. The official guideline given was to "adopt a looser standard of guilt known as more likely than not." Reading through the case details, all the evidence points towards Mumphery being innocent - I certainly don't think it meets the "more likely than not" standard. If anything deserves critique here, it is MSU's handling of this case, not the broader guideline recommended by the Education Department.