3 ms·
> But that circles back to my original question. How does the gov not have the power to boot you out (or jail) just from committing the terrorist act in itself?
by rdtsc 7y ago
> But that circles back to my original question. How does the gov not have the power to boot you out (or jail) just from committing the terrorist act in itself?
Because they have to prove it in court. And the defendant can ask for a lawyers. And then both the cost, and the level of proof required is a lot higher. Will the US have enough time and resources to go to the originating country and inspect all the evidence, check the archives and so on? Probably not for every case.
The alternative they just need to prove they lied on a form and they signed and acknowledged that lying on it means getting kicked out. That's a simple and shut case most of the time.
- notmyaccount 7y agoTo prove that they lied on the form, wouldn't they have to legally prove that he is a terrorist and go through the same legal process which you said will be avoided? It seems pointless.
- rdl 7y agoI believe it is 1) different venue for trial (administrative vs a criminal case) and possibly 2) different standard of proof, especially for non permanent residents. (Not a lawyer nor an immigration expert on US law, though.)