3 ms·

That's not context, those are "estimate numbers" about COVERT operations you didn't even source. The drone numbers are even less useful because two different U

That's not context, those are "estimate numbers" about COVERT operations you didn't even source. The drone numbers are even less useful because two different US administrations [0] [1] went through the effort of redefining "enemy combatant" to pretty up the "collateral damage" by drones. That's why Pakistan alone actually tallies up to over 3.400 drone victims [2]. You then compare that with 1989 Tiananmen Square and Tibet, so it is only fair to also factor in 2003 Iraq because just like China hasn't admitted any wrongdoing in Tiananmen Square, the US has yet to admit that going into Iraq was wrong. Which counts just as much regardless of the US "not annexing Iraq", it still was an illegal war of aggression wreaking havoc on a sovereign country, killing hundreds of thousands of people, displacing millions as refugees, with the US government employing tactics like torture and abducting family members to fight an insurgency [3], destabilizing the region to this day. And that's only Iraq, which hasn't been the only "US terrorism interventions" we've had in these past 2 decades but only one out of many. The fact that so many people are unaware/in denial about a lot of this, only shows how effective the US government has been in hiding and legitimizing its own crimes against humanity. And even when international bodies, like the ICC, try to investigate: The US shuts it down by sabotaging [4] any efforts at investigation and flat out threatening involved countries with sanctions [5]. So if we really want to be "realists", we have to be real about all of it, and not just cherry-pick estimated numbers to tally them up against each other. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_combatant#Change_of_meaning_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_combatant#Change_of_mean... [1] https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/under-obama-men-killed-by-drones-are-presumed-to-be-terrorists/257749/ https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/under-o... [2] http://drones.pitchinteractive.com/ http://drones.pitchinteractive.com/ [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_prison_abuse_scandals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_prison_abuse_scandals [4] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/15/mike-pompeo-us-war-crimes-investigation-international-criminal-court https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/15/mike-pompeo-... [5] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45474864 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45474864

ethbro 7y ago
Do you have a better citation than [2]? That's not exactly a confidence-inspiring source. And if you want to include Iraq, then we should include Korea. My point being, the last time the US murdered that many of its own citizens was April 6, 1865.
- freeflight 7y ago
  Why is that source not confidence-inspiring? And don't you think it's quite telling, in-itself, that no transparent and reliable numbers exist on this? > My point being, the last time the US murdered that many of its own citizens was April 6, 1865. I don't see how that's a point for anything, crimes against humanity are not defined by the citizenship of the victims. It's also an extremely dishonest take: If my own government is oppressing me, I at least can have the hope of starting a "revolution" and overthrow said government to improve the situation. When it's a foreign government doing it, and not even my countries own military was able to stop them, what are my options to change anything? Not many, maybe start an insurgency, but anything that would "take the fight" to the actual enemy, an external enemy, would be considered "international terrorism".

ethbro 7y ago

Do you have a better citation than [2]? That's not exactly a confidence-inspiring source. And if you want to include Iraq, then we should include Korea. My point being, the last time the US murdered that many of its own citizens was April 6, 1865.

freeflight 7y ago
Why is that source not confidence-inspiring? And don't you think it's quite telling, in-itself, that no transparent and reliable numbers exist on this? > My point being, the last time the US murdered that many of its own citizens was April 6, 1865. I don't see how that's a point for anything, crimes against humanity are not defined by the citizenship of the victims. It's also an extremely dishonest take: If my own government is oppressing me, I at least can have the hope of starting a "revolution" and overthrow said government to improve the situation. When it's a foreign government doing it, and not even my countries own military was able to stop them, what are my options to change anything? Not many, maybe start an insurgency, but anything that would "take the fight" to the actual enemy, an external enemy, would be considered "international terrorism".