3 ms·
To be fair, it’s not just Reyes’s “word “. If you read the motion to vacate, Reyes gives a full account of the rape beginning to end that is consistent with the
by throwaway987665 7y ago
To be fair, it’s not just Reyes’s “word “. If you read the motion to vacate, Reyes gives a full account of the rape beginning to end that is consistent with the evidence and included some details only the attacker would know. There is also evidence that he was later in the park by himself and not with this group of teen agers.
- whastplants05 7y agoReyes's testimony was after he spent a year in prison with one of the men originally convicted. Further, his testimony was not consistent with the physical evidence: > Reyes, 31, doesn’t mention using a knife, and a law-enforcement source said that when he was interviewed by prosecutors, he never mentioned using a knife or a razor. The medical source said this makes it doubtful Reyes acted alone because the scalp wounds that made her lose 75 to 85 percent of her blood volume were caused by a sharp object. https://nypost.com/2002/11/02/new-jogger-case-doubt-rapist-couldnt-have-acted-alone-doc/ https://nypost.com/2002/11/02/new-jogger-case-doubt-rapist-c...
- throwaway987665 7y agoRead the analysis of Reyes testimony on http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/wise.pdf http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/wise.pdf