5 ms·
> if you are going to flag or downvote please tell me what the article gets factually wrong Half the articles on the "Weird Republic" web site you link to are
by peisistratos 7y ago
> if you are going to flag or downvote please tell me what the article gets factually wrong
Half the articles on the "Weird Republic" web site you link to are bashing a host of various black people and things. Jesse Jackson, Kwanzaa, reparations for slavery, it's just article after article bashing blacks. I don't have time to read this white trash gutter nonsense, I've heard it enough before.
Two comments back you're talking about "white people were specifically being targeted for violence" and on and on racist white trash David Duke like gutter talk. I don't have the time to go out and research the falsity of every little thing. You probably don't even deserve the time I expend for this comment, I'm not going to waste my day seeing why every point of that nonsense anti-black site is wrong.
I am white and I do not look down on blacks who were not even allowed to vote or drink from water fountains in my parent's time. I look down on pathetic white trash who have accomplished nothing and have some sick desire to continue to suppress the black African nation that was kidnapped by the white American nation.
This web site has comments from white billionaires, white millionaires, extraordinary white programmers and such, and ordinary but hard working, hard studying white programmers like me, and we have no desire to waste our time exploring or even exposing the sewer that you and the Weird Republic David Duke people dwell in.
- dang 7y agoPlease don't break the site guidelines yourself, regardless of how bad another comment was. Racial and ideological rants are not ok here, let alone "I look down on pathetic white trash". Would you please review the site guidelines and use this site as intended? https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- whastplants05 7y agoHi dang, thanks for all the work you do around here moderating. The article georgemonck linked goes into a lot of details of the case others here ignored, and yet he was banned while peisistratos is using racial slurs and mockingly refusing to discuss a single thing georgemonck's article gets wrong. It seems like peisistratos is not interested in engaging in meaningful conversation. Thanks.
- dang 7y agogeorgemonck isn't banned. What made you think he was? In terms of HN moderation, please remember two things: (1) one user's bad behavior does not justify another's breaking the guidelines (a.k.a. two wrongs don't make a right), and (2) HN moderators don't come close to seeing everything that gets posted, so consistent moderation isn't possible–we just don't have the resources. If you see a bad comment go unmoderated, the likeliest explanation is that we didn't see it.