4 ms·
>Really seems like Wall Street is in love with the term "shadow banking", Actually, the hedge fund and private equity fund people hate that term because it imp
by jasode 7y ago
>Really seems like Wall Street is in love with the term "shadow banking",
Actually, the hedge fund and private equity fund people hate that term because it implies something nefarious is happening. In reality, the new post-2008 crisis bank regulations in both Europe and USA to ensure stability causes a new phenomenon to emerge: Non-banks lending money to companies that banks are not allowed to lend to.
Every economist and financial regulator knows this became a side-effect of the more stringent financial regulations. So the "too big to fail" banks will still lend millions to big companies like Microsoft and Apple, but the $50m companies are too small and too risky to bother with.
Look how these "shadow" lending transactions keep emerging...
- a billion dollar pension fund is woefully short of its obligations to pensioners and needs a higher yield on its money. Buying safe US T-bills that yield 1% interest is not enough. They need to look at alternative asset classes that gets them in that ~8% range.
- a medium-size company needs $50 million loan to expand its business and is willing to pay a higher interest rate than 1% T-Bills. (That makes sense since the company doesn't have the same credit worthiness as the US Government.)
- If the pension fund (needing to put their money to work) and the company (needing a loan) can match up with each other, they can help each other's goals. But the pension fund isn't in the business of analyzing credit risk or providing loans directly. Likewise, the owner of the company doesn't have the time to fly all over the country and meet with 100 different pension fund officers.
That's where middlemen like private equity come in. They're the ones with the staff of credit analysts. The "back office" of the private equity fund that analyzes a company's credit worthiness does much of the same work that the credit analysts at JP Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, etc did. They become the "shadow bank". Of course, they also charge management fees and a % of the profits for their "financial intermediary" services.
The middle market's underlying need for credit never disappeared. The new bank regulations just inevitably shifted the loan transactions to a different set of players.
- wrong_variable 7y agoThanks for that explanation, I have been so confused with the term "shadow banking" - it makes perfect sense now.
- Despegar 7y agoThe shadow banking is fine. The taxpayer isn't responsible if a PE fund engaged in direct lending to the middle market loses all their money. But shadow banking can and should be scrutinized, and potentially regulated, if there are systemic risks that will lead to the taxpayer being on the hook once again. If it's just isolated private actors losing money it doesn't matter.
- kgwgk 7y agoThe “private actors” are not always so private: CalPERS is doing a lot of PE, for example.
- Kyragem 7y agoCalPERS should really fire their 100 Goldman Sachs advisors and really do what NVPERS is doing (fund managed by 1 person who mainly invests in index funds).
- ericd 7y agoAnd I think this hits the nail on the head for where the problems are going to come from. Low interest rates have made it very hard for pension funds to keep up with their (overgenerous) past promises with safe assets, and a frothy stock market seems like it’s been keeping them solvent.
- nqzero 7y agothe article claims that the banks (the same ones that were bailed out in 2008) are the source of the capital that the shadow banks lending to companies so the taxpayer is on the line (at least, as much as they were in 2008)
- jpalomaki 7y agoBanks seem to be involved as well, ”According to the latest report from the Federal Reserve, unregulated credit funds now have access to more than $1 trillion in lines of credit from regulated banks, an increase of 65 percent over five years” So instead of banks lending directly to the risky mid-size businesses, they are lending to trustworthy middle men?
- SilasX 7y agoNone of that helps unless the PE firm can actually get that 8% return. The chase for yield during the recent (last ~15 years) "global savings glut" has been pretty disastrous.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]