3 ms·
You still haven't actually answered the question of what "right" there is supposed to be. If a person is afraid that their fiance might have done porn in the p
by jonnycomputer 7y ago
You still haven't actually answered the question of what "right" there is supposed to be.
If a person is afraid that their fiance might have done porn in the past, or if they care so damn much, they should just ask the person.
- bitL 7y agoIf people were honest to each other all the time, we wouldn't need laws. Let's be generous and assume your question is just naive - could you ever envision a situation where an innocent husband-to-be (e.g. a nice, do-no-harm person and with reasonable means) is taken advantage of by a clever woman (with what is perceivably considered shady past in the given era) for her own material benefit? Do you think this never happens (hint: belletry is full of such situations and I'd recommend you to investigate common causes of suicide)? Doesn't husband-to-be have a justified interest in protecting his life, reputation, possessions from the baggage the unvetted fiancee brings? Do you think the fiancee wouldn't lie as much as possible in order to protect her planned future? If you truly are just naive, please think about the points I mentioned; if not, there is no point to discuss, as your mind is set in stone anyway.
- jonnycomputer 7y agoYou literally said "everyone". If you're best friend knows, and your Mom knows, and your neighbor knows, and your dog knows, and your boss knows, but you don't? then you're either a fool or no one likes you. but note: the "you" in that sentence isn't you. I'm not saying you are a fool. Then why did you say I was? "let's be generous and assume the question is just naive" Again, you've never established a right. And there is also this horrible assumption or belief that once doing porn forever marks or stains you. Well, certainly some people believe that. But I do not, and I challenge it.