3 ms·
I started out as a kid with DOS, somehow skipping win 3.11 and then pretty much everything from win 95 to XP. Then I started using Linux in parallel ca. 2003. B
by iforgotpassword 7y ago
I started out as a kid with DOS, somehow skipping win 3.11 and then pretty much everything from win 95 to XP. Then I started using Linux in parallel ca. 2003. Before that I only took a couple curious looks.
Started out with kde3, switched to gnome 2, and as those two evolved found myself longing for simpler and snappier solutions. Windows was evolving relatively slowly but even there you'd always lose one or two things every time you upgraded. On Linux this was much more radical. Not just the desktop but also the stuff under the hood.
Today I just prefer the minimal version of most things I use and do daily. i3 does the job for window management. Vim with as little plugins as possible for scripting and coding (as long as it's not Java or c++ with qt). Since eventually my favorite plugin will stop working as it's unmaintained, or the file manager will get an overhaul and look different and have all its keyboard shortcuts changed. The less stuff I depend on the better.
- sureaboutthis 7y ago> I started out as a kid with DOS Great strides in medical advancement or human growth hormones?
- JadeNB 7y ago> > I started out as a kid with DOS > Great strides in medical advancement or human growth hormones? Is this a joke, or scepticism about the timeline? It's certainly possible to have started out as a kid with DOS; I did, too, although it was just before Windows 3 came on the scene.
- MisterTea 7y agoI'm sure this was a joke meant to play on the sentence "I started out as a kid with DOS", which when humorously twisted around could be interpreted that as a child, he was a computer that ran DOS. Stop all the downloadin.
- sureaboutthis 7y agoYep. Thank you.