The exact logical misstep made in this article is at the point where it is somehow assumed that saying a single solution is wrong (in this case by calling it an

The exact logical misstep made in this article is at the point where it is somehow assumed that saying a single solution is wrong (in this case by calling it an antipattern) is only done because someone believes a single solution is right (by calling it a pattern). This is completely fallacious, as there may be many commonly executed good and bad solutions. We would just like to differentiate between which ones nearly always lead to dramatic costs later, and which ones nearly always lead to low costs later.