3 ms·
Because the previous title was editorialized? Furthermore, perhaps the conversation is about the old title because it was, and now the conversation can go be ab
by lvh 7y ago
Because the previous title was editorialized? Furthermore, perhaps the conversation is about the old title because it was, and now the conversation can go be about Storm itself :)
- _cs2017_ 7y agoI think the rule about not editorializing needs an exception so that someone can point out an important or interesting fact using an article whose original title is too generic. Another example would be "Press release from XYZ". If it talks about XYZ reaching some major breakthrough, the title should be allowed to reflect that. It's a waste of everyone's time to post the article titled "Press release". And arguably this situation should fall under such an exception.