3 ms·
I know tiling DE followers have firm principles in my experience so please don't take this the wrong way because everyone is different. My personal experience
by INTPenis 7y ago
I know tiling DE followers have firm principles in my experience so please don't take this the wrong way because everyone is different.
My personal experience is that I used a lot of tiling DE back when I had a laptop with 256M RAM.
Lately my last three laptops have had 8G and more of RAM so I don't see the point.
Mainly because I use vim+tmux as an IDE. So I'm already using keyboard shortcuts extensively to quickly navigate through vim, vim tabs and tmux.
A tiling DE would add a third layer on top, that I don't feel I need.
Sure I'm a Linux veteran who has been using keyboard shortcuts for 20 years but there are limits to how far I want to push this. And I feel that vim+tmux is my limit. My DE is vanilla Gnome Desktop on Fedora and I'm loving it. (obviously with animations disabled it feels as snappy as Sway or Awesome WM)
Edit: Just to expand; after hours of coding my brain can do vim+tmux keyboard shortcuts without thinking. The short breaks within that time where I switch to other windows would only disrupt my flow if I had to switch to a whole new set of shortcuts.
- therein 7y agoIt is really no different than using the Windows/Meta key + arrow keys to snap the current window to a corner, or using Ctrl + Windows/Meta + arrow keys to switch to another virtual desktop. Just a matter of getting used to. It doesn't even take too much to get used to it.
- alpaca128 7y agoIn my case I don't need a third layer on top, I simply don't use(aka don't need) tmux most of the time - I just run terminal buffers inside NeoVim tabs/windows and can switch quickly between workspaces and windows via i3 shortcuts. But if I was forced to use a DE I'd also go for Gnome - it's pretty polished and provides switchable workspaces a bit like i3. It's just not near as configurable as I'd like.