4 ms·
"Being a drone would explain accelerations that would kill humans." It doesn't explain: - Operations far from any support vehicles (no carrier like the F-18
by Recurecur 7y ago
"Being a drone would explain accelerations that would kill humans."
It doesn't explain:
- Operations far from any support vehicles (no carrier like the F-18s had). Must be a nuclear/LENR/antimatter power source.
- Going from hover to high supersonic/hypersonic. No current hypersonic platform has anything like that capability
- The acceleration involved in the extremely rapid course change at the end of the one video has been estimated at "hundreds of Gs". That's far beyond the current highest performance missiles, which top out at a few tens of Gs. This is similar to several historical reports.
- The lack of conventional wings, control surfaces or visible windows/sensors
- The "field effect" visible around the object at times. There's no technology in the open literature like that.
I find these videos extremely convincing, and interesting!
request: Provide a way to do decent lists!
- deepnotderp 7y agoI can't explain 2 and 3, but the rest can all be explained by plasma cloaking.
- deepnotderp 7y agoPlasma cloaking and MHD control can be used for wingless aerodynamic control.