2 ms·
“Slavery” doesn’t have just one configuration. It’s just a word that we sometimes use to describe certain kinds of superior-inferior relationships: master-serv
by somatic 7y ago
“Slavery” doesn’t have just one configuration.
It’s just a word that we sometimes use to describe certain kinds of superior-inferior relationships: master-servant, lord-peasant, employer-employee, landlord-tenant, etc.
Or how about debtpeon-bank?
Taxman-taxpayer...
Government-citizen...
State-subject...
You say “slavery” and you think of “black slavery”, but do you think of the ruthlessly exploited sharecropper?
How about the fresh-faced grad indentured to his debt for life?
The newlywed with the mortgage on the house that cost him 10x what it cost his father?
Slavery is closer than you think.