> These games have so much more to them than reaction time and dexterity Sure but they're still an important part of the end result which most people don't con

> These games have so much more to them than reaction time and dexterity Sure but they're still an important part of the end result which most people don't consider. For many the title just says "AI beats human mind". If you want to know which mind is better then compare minds, all else equal. "Dumb" bots have been kicking player's butts for years now. Not because of intelligence but because everything else was not equal: great aim, great reaction time, great situational awareness. So aren't you curious how much the "intelligence" part evolved? Imagine a 100m sprint where one of the runners has to wear army boots and backpack. Would you even bother drawing a conclusion?