> Because if you work less than that then the employee does not generate enough revenue to pay for the overhead cost of benefits. Nonsense. If this were true p

> Because if you work less than that then the employee does not generate enough revenue to pay for the overhead cost of benefits. Nonsense. If this were true part-time jobs wouldn't exist, but they do. There's no shortage of stories of people working at major retailers and being unable to get >29 hours / week because the employer doesn't want them crossing into full-time status (IRS defines this at 30 hours, many companies follow this for benefits purposes as well).