> at close range, FTW excelled in combat, in part because its reaction time was half that of a human's, and in part because its accuracy was 80 percent compared

> at close range, FTW excelled in combat, in part because its reaction time was half that of a human's, and in part because its accuracy was 80 percent compared to the humans' 50 percent. [0] I see now that reaction time was compensated for. No info on accuracy. [0] https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/05/googles-ai-group-moves-on-from-go-tackles-quake-iii-arena/?comments=1&unread=1#unread https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/05/googles-ai-group-mov...