8 ms·
the main advantage for me is that Cloudflare's free tier has no bandwidth limit. Netlify's free tier has a 100GB/month limit (https://www.netlify.com/blog/2019/
by jvns 7y ago
the main advantage for me is that Cloudflare's free tier has no bandwidth limit. Netlify's free tier has a 100GB/month limit (https://www.netlify.com/blog/2019/02/26/netlify-and-bandwidth/ https://www.netlify.com/blog/2019/02/26/netlify-and-bandwidt...). I put Cloudflare in front of my Netlify site because of that.
- JonLim 7y agoAh, you know for some reason I was thinking Cloudflare was also doing some hosting, and now I realize I shouldn't make comments on things without having consumed a coffee to start the day. I also have Cloudflare in front of my site, but that was there before I made the switch, and it's great!
- jopsen 7y agoWhat are your odds of hitting 100GB/month Assuming you're just hosting your personal blog?
- jvns 7y agoI used about 350GB in the last month according to Cloudflare (over about 3.5 million requests), probably because I serve a lot of 5-10MB PDFs. Being able to not worry about bandwidth fees for a medium sized personal site is really amazing.
- Gys 7y agoOr instead spend some time to optimize your website a little (like not hosting yourself standard stuff like jquery, Bootstrap and such, compress images, etc). So you can serve 10s of 1000s visitors without hitting a 100 GB free tier ;-)
- detaro 7y agoYou're responding to someone running one of the more well-known developer blogs and hosting PDFs, it's not exactly surprising she might need a bit more bandwidth.
- doliveira 7y agoThat does not follow, though. It's not like people are generally optimizing their bundle sizes when they are in services where that costs money like AWS or there's a quota like Netlify. Not having a limit liberates you to deliver other types of content and you have something less to worry about. It does not imply not worrying about optimizing your users' experience