3 ms·

I think most would agree that ‘surveillance’ for increasing odds of healthy outcomes is significantly different than surveillance used to make a buck. Would yo

I think most would agree that ‘surveillance’ for increasing odds of healthy outcomes is significantly different than surveillance used to make a buck. Would you object to blood pressure and heart surveillance if you were in the hospital?

vonmoltke 7y ago
It's still surveillance, which is the point. Making a broad statement about surveillance is ridiculous, particularly when it is made in the same breath as a statement about advertising (which is a much less nuanced situation).