2 ms·
Not that person, but you said this: > There is functionally no difference between trying to interact with talented support staff who aren't fluent in your lang
by username90 7y ago
Not that person, but you said this:
> There is functionally no difference between trying to interact with talented support staff who aren't fluent in your language, and trying to interact with illiterate support staff.
That statement reeks of ignorance. It seems you have almost no experience with other languages than your own, or you would know that communicating while being non-fluent or with a non-fluent works just fine most of the time. Sometimes misunderstandings happens and it can be a bit slower but that is all.
- fernandotakai 7y agothis statement is downright offensive and something i wouldn't expect to read here. fluency is a high barrier to clear. it took me 5 years of speaking/reading/writing english daily to come even close to "fluency". before that, i had a really good advanced english, but i wasn't fluent. and it didn't mean i was "illiterate".
- thaumaturgy 7y ago> Sometimes misunderstandings happens and it can be a bit slower but that is all. So your position is that support that's a bit slower, with some misunderstandings, is exactly as good as fast support without misunderstandings, even in downtime-sensitive applications. Well, okay then.