3 ms·
This was already done for the JVM. It was an utter failure, and not economically viable at all. As the OP said: this is reinventing the JVM, just worse. Includ
by Slartie 7y ago
This was already done for the JVM. It was an utter failure, and not economically viable at all.
As the OP said: this is reinventing the JVM, just worse. Including making all the mistakes again.
(At least for the server, that is. I see a great future for WebAssembly on client systems, where the JVM can be considered a failure.)