4 ms·
Maybe they should revert back to PR to yield better Search results
by baxtr 7y ago
Maybe they should revert back to PR to yield better Search results
- ChrisCinelli 7y agoSo I am not the only one that get pretty bad search results compared to the ones I used to get. What caused this shift?
- anticensor 7y agoThe current algorithm includes PageRank as its component.
- thrwayxyz 7y agoThe Google results started going bad for me around when project humming bird came along. We need a distributed open data alternative that can be tweaked for your proferences transparently. And we also need to start paying for the internet. The malvertising model we have now is unsustainable and crippling the network in favour of Facebook and Google.
- bborud 7y agoWhat's stopping you from doing it?
- thrwayxyz 7y agoThe open source community is a toxic tarpit filled with the unemployable who will happily accuse you of rape or worse to get a $50 payout.
- xhgdvjky 7y agoI would pay for a personalized search engine. I think if the results are ad free I'd pay 10-15 per year (not much since Google is decent).
- kumarvvr 7y ago> We need a distributed open data alternative that can be tweaked for your proferences transparently Wonder if some organization like ACLU or the like take up such a project and release a paid version for power users.
- antisemiotic 7y agoTurning off the recaptcha harrassment of people trying to search repeatedly with refined terms would be a good start. But hey, now you can type a query while piss drunk and Google will understand, progress!
- ClassyJacket 7y agoThe problem with this is that your definition of 'good results' and Google's definition of 'good results' are somewhat in conflict since you have different goals.