Has anyone else read the judgement? The case itself is super fun. Some sweet justice was served on the jackasses behind Enzyte. They lied through their teeth to

Has anyone else read the judgement? The case itself is super fun. Some sweet justice was served on the jackasses behind Enzyte. They lied through their teeth to convince people to buy their product, enrolled them in recurring payments against their wishes, and lied to banks to let them keep running. Almost all the convictions were upheld in this ruling. In fact, the ruling that the defendant's fourth amendment right was violated ended up having no bearing on the case. The evidence was not thrown out because they ruled that the agents acted in good faith according to the law (which they didn't even follow correctly). The fault is put on the law. Does that mean that if the law (stored communications act) is challenged as unconstitutional that the case could be re-ajudicated and the charges overturned? (Also, sad to see this sentence in a legal document: "All told, the electronic evidence originating at Berkeley filled three “tera-drives” and numbered 17 million pages." pretty sure they meant terabytes.)