The overall tone of this article is really bitter and seems like it’s written by someone who has a really aggressive anti-corporate stance. I’m not familiar wit

The overall tone of this article is really bitter and seems like it’s written by someone who has a really aggressive anti-corporate stance. I’m not familiar with the publication, maybe that’s their agenda. As a business owner, I strongly disagree with the fundamental premise of the article. I, as a business owner, take on a significant amount of risk to start a business. I sell services to clients and change the clients more than I pay my workers in order to turn a profit. My workers get paid a fair hourly wage and are treated well in exchange for selling their labor. That’s the arrangement. As a worker you have two options: 1. sell your labor in exchange for a fair wage. You make money. I make a profit. As the owner of the business I get to keep the profit. 2. Start your own business. Then you get to keep the profit in exchange for a lot of work, stress and risk. It’s a simple equation. If you don’t want to do number 2, then you’ll be doing number 1. It’s simply a matter of preference. Neither is better than the other.