4 ms·
#0 is correct. I'll recommend this piece on S&W [1] and specifically on point #5 [2]. These style guides, especially points #1 through #6, came about from bure
by ben509 7y ago
#0 is correct. I'll recommend this piece on S&W [1] and specifically on point #5 [2].
These style guides, especially points #1 through #6, came about from bureaucrats who were essentially filibustering or otherwise obfuscating in their writing.
The root problem there was not the long-winded writing, it was their intent to hide bad things.
If you can make sure you're not carrying water for corrupt officials, you best strategy is to try to write natural prose. Yes, do look for wordy phrases or cliches, but don't obsess over adverbs or the passive voice.
[1] https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=15509 https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=15509
[2] http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003366.html http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003366.h...
- Veen 7y agoGeoffrey Pullum (author of the language log article you link to) also has an excellent set of videos explaining why most advice about passives is bunkum. https://youtu.be/suAASPc_s0A https://youtu.be/suAASPc_s0A