3 ms·
> With certain narrow exceptions, though, no data about me personally should be collected without my explicit permission regardless. Well, I don't agree with t
by umvi 7y ago
> With certain narrow exceptions, though, no data about me personally should be collected without my explicit permission regardless.
Well, I don't agree with that. I don't see any reason people should have a right to "own" information observed about them.
I make observations all the time about other people. You can't force me to forget what I've observed. Computers make it easier to "remember" and process observations, true, but at the root there is no difference between me observing stuff and writing it down and a computer observing stuff and writing it down.
- JohnFen 7y agoI suspect your objection may mostly fall into what I consider exceptions, such as things done in public spaces (although I don't think it's sustainable to assert that you give up all privacy rights in public spaces). > at the root there is no difference between me observing stuff and writing it down and a computer observing stuff and writing it down. If that computer isn't talking with other computers, I agree. I actually don't have much of a problem with individuals making individual observations of public behavior and writing them down or storing them in a computer. My concern is more about the parameters around sharing that data (mostly because of the existence of databases and data mining). Further, I'm far more concerned about data collected about me on the internet than in the physical public square. That said, I do and will continue to go out of my way to avoid as much surveillance as possible even in physical public spaces. For instance, any store using those surveillance devices intended to analyze my shopping behavior, moods, etc., in order to target ads at me is a store I won't be stepping into.