2 ms·
That is assuming that the bullshitter or another participant doesn't understand what they read. Also sounds like the Chair did not control the meeting.
by C1sc0cat 7y ago
That is assuming that the bullshitter or another participant doesn't understand what they read.
Also sounds like the Chair did not control the meeting.
- r00fus 7y agoSometimes there is no clear or a weak "chair". Furthermore, if the bullshitter is influential enough that you don't have time/capital in-meeting to call their BS? That's why BS is successful. I see the Amazon approach as an augment to the chair to keep the discussion on-topic. If it's not discussed on the paper, the burden is on the dissenter to provide info / present credentials to rebut.