5 ms·
>The kind of modernization proposed by the TFA seems reasonable to me, though. No. Don't fall for this. This is the siren song that leads you down the dark pat
by LiquidSky 7y ago
>The kind of modernization proposed by the TFA seems reasonable to me, though.
No. Don't fall for this. This is the siren song that leads you down the dark path to Penn Station.
- ihuman 7y agoBut unlike Penn Station they're just suggesting modernizing the hidden sections the public doesn't see.
- anoncake 7y agoAnd they aren't suggesting tearing down anything.
- rayiner 7y agoThe problem with Penn Station is not that they razed it. It’s that they built an cramped and gross underground station to replace it. If they had put in a modern glass and steel station in the lobby of a skyscraper, only architecture nerds would be complaining.
- usrusr 7y agoIt's an illustration of how the hit-ratio of contemporary architects (give or take half a century) is terribly low. It even seems to approach zero once you start factoring in longevity. Steel and concrete is notorious for failing to meet even embarrassingly low longevity expectations. Use modern materials behind the scenes if it's unavoidable due to cost, but advertising them as a longevity upgrade would be pure hubris.
- TremendousJudge 7y ago>Steel and concrete is notorious for failing to meet even embarrassingly low longevity expectations. What? Low quality work, yes, as it's true for all other materials and methods. There are steel and concrete buildings that have lasted 100 years so far just fine.
- usrusr 7y ago> that have lasted 100 years so far just fine. Which isn't terribly impressive, unless you assume zero maintenance conditions (which admittedly hit pretty much everything else harder than concrete)
- Retra 7y agoIt is impressive when you compare it to all the buildings built from wood framing.